Indian parliamentarians receive free
accommodation in Delhi as a perc of office. The accommodation is allocated by
parliamentary committee, chaired for example by the chief party whip, on the
basis of seniority.
The more senior residences are grandiose
mansions with sweeping gardens in ideal Delhi locations, close to the
parliament and surrounded by other similar constructs, far from the
overcrowding and pollution for which Delhi is famous.
Others are more modest bungalows, still in
plum positions. Others still are mere apartments.
Some residences are in good shape, others
are run-down, even decrepit.
All are allocated by committee, on the
basis of seniority.
As a consequence, parliamentarians are
constantly relocating from one residence to another, as they shift portfolios,
as their fortunes and governments change, as they become second or third
termers in the parliament.
Some wit has even suggested it’s one of the
Indian government’s most successful and long-standing employment generating
programs, keeping hordes of removalists on the road.
Why does India do this, and what might be
the consequences?
The tradition is a hangover from the late
colonial period, after Delhi was belatedly made capital of the Imperial jewel
in 1911, and from the early Nehruvian period, after the properties fell into
the hands of a regime not overly fond of disposing of its assets.
Why continue with it today though, in this
era of liberal and capital ideology? Surely it makes more sense to instead allocate
to parliamentarians a housing allowance, to do with as they wish, and make the
properties available, in the first case to parliamentarians who want to rent
them, and then to the open market if they do not.
When I put this suggestion to a relatively
senior parliamentarian, he replied this cannot happen, because the market
rental for even a modest parliamentary bungalow, he insisted, is about four
times his income as a parliamentarian.
Before I was able to respond to this reply,
his attention was dragged elsewhere. But you don’t need to think too hard to
realise that releasing the property to market, and providing parliamentarians
with an allowance for accommodation that matches the prices achieved by the
properties in the market costs the Indian government exactly nothing.
And it reduces by one the number of
parliamentary committees, and the associated costs (not least of which is the
potential for abuse of process that simply having the committee creates). And
it removes the game of musical chairs that parliamentarians play, and instead
gives them the opportunity to find for themselves a residence that suits best
their needs, one they can be surer of holding on to for as long as they might
need it.
And it creates the potential for using
market funds to renovate, rebuild, even sub-divide some of the monstrously
large properties in the most valuable and prized part of Delhi’s residential
property market.
And it greatly diminishes the potential for
the kind of embarrassment revealed by the current corruption scandal that has
embroiled one former senior minister. The minister’s approved and allocated
accommodation, it seems, was spacious enough that he had permitted a call
centre to set up and operate from his residence. Not that there’s anything
wrong with that under the current system – it’s only because he allegedly used
public funds to install 300 phone lines to the residence that his activities
have drawn the public eye and ire.
One more for the to do list, mother India.
No comments:
Post a Comment